Category Breakdown
Philips S200
Performance
4.01.2
Camera
0.90.3
Display
0.06.1
Battery
1.10.6
Build
1.60.6
Overall
1.51.8
Summary
- Both the Philips S200 and QMobile share identical specifications across all categories, including build quality, display, performance, camera, battery, and software experience.
- Neither device offers any notable features in terms of display size, resolution, or refresh rate, as both are set at 60Hz without HDR support.
- Performance metrics are also the same, with both phones lacking RAM and storage specifications.
- The camera capabilities are non-existent, featuring no rear or selfie megapixels.
- Battery specifications are identical, with both devices having unspecified capacities and no fast or wireless charging options.
- Lastly, the software experience is uniform, with no details provided on the operating system or audio features.
Side-by-side Specification Comparison
Philips S200
General
Release Date
N/A
N/A
Announced
N/A
N/A
Description
N/A
N/A
Display
Size
N/A
N/A
Type
N/A
N/A
Resolution
N/A
N/A
PPI
0
0
Refresh Rate
60Hz
60Hz
Peak Brightness
N/A
N/A
HDR Support
✗
✗
Protection
N/A
N/A
Performance
Chipset
N/A
N/A
CPU
N/A
N/A
GPU
N/A
N/A
Memory
N/A
N/A
Expandable Storage
N/A
N/A
Card Slot
N/A
N/A
Camera
Main Camera
N/A
N/A
Main Camera Details
N/A
N/A
Front Camera
N/A
N/A
Front Camera Details
N/A
N/A
Video Recording
N/A
N/A
Selfie Video
N/A
N/A
OIS
✗
✗
Night Mode
✗
✗
RAW Support
✗
✗
Battery
Capacity
N/A
N/A
Battery Details
N/A
N/A
Charging Details
N/A
N/A
Fast Charging
✗
✗
Wireless Charging
✗
✗
Build & Design
Dimensions
N/A
N/A
Weight
N/A
N/A
Materials
N/A
N/A
Water Resistance
N/A
N/A
Colors
N/A
N/A
Foldable
✗
✗
Connectivity
SIM
N/A
N/A
Network
N/A
N/A
Network Speed
N/A
N/A
5G
✗
✗
4G
✗
✗
WiFi
N/A
N/A
Bluetooth
N/A
N/A
NFC
✗
✗
USB
N/A
N/A
IR Blaster
✗
✗
Headphone Jack
✗
✗
Radio
✗
✗
Positioning
N/A
N/A
Software
Operating System
N/A
N/A
OS Version
N/A
N/A
Security
Fingerprint
✗
✗
Face Unlock
✗
✗
Sensors
N/A
N/A
Audio
Stereo Speakers
✗
✗
Loudspeaker
N/A
N/A
Audio Jack
N/A
N/A